Court handles NOVA-Stroy’s case
18 September 2009 (12:16)
Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court is still investigating the claim laid by Sverdlovsk Region’s Deputy Prosecutor against NOVA-Stroy, the local developer.
The plaintiff demands that the company return a 2,244-square-meter land allotment at 18 Cherepanov St. to the City of Yekaterinburg.
The court has already agreed to make it illegal for the defendant to carry out any transactions involving the disputed land allotment or to convey the right over this property to any third party.
The Deputy Prosecutor explained that this was necessary since NOVA-Stroy might attempt to register its rights over the building that was being put up in the allotment; he also believed the developer might try to convey the rights over the building to some third party, which would make the implementation of the court’s orders much more difficult and could result in a lot of damage.
The next court hearing has been scheduled for September 17, 2009.
The plaintiff demands that the company return a 2,244-square-meter land allotment at 18 Cherepanov St. to the City of Yekaterinburg.
The court has already agreed to make it illegal for the defendant to carry out any transactions involving the disputed land allotment or to convey the right over this property to any third party.
The Deputy Prosecutor explained that this was necessary since NOVA-Stroy might attempt to register its rights over the building that was being put up in the allotment; he also believed the developer might try to convey the rights over the building to some third party, which would make the implementation of the court’s orders much more difficult and could result in a lot of damage.
The next court hearing has been scheduled for September 17, 2009.
Embed to Blog | Subscribe to Newsletter |
Other materials on the topic::
- Avtoprodiks Gets Involved in Avtofrans’s Case in Yekaterinburg
- Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court keeps looking into the claim laid by Sverdlovsk Region public prosecution authorities against Glavsreduralstroy Management Company. The plaintiff demands that the defendant’s land renting agreement be declared invalid.
- Court looks into Bank Severnaya Kazna vs. Mayak
- Court rules in favor of MBRD
- Arbitration Courts vetoes transactions with land allotment in Yekaterinburg