Yekaterinburg: insurer is fined for imposing extra services
18 August 2015 (17:23)
August 18, 2015. Rosgosstrakh, an insurance company, was sentenced to a 7,000-RUR fine in Yekaterinburg; the company was detected to make its customers buy extra (unnecessary) services, Sverdlovsk Region division of Rospotrebnadzor (the state consumer rights watchdog) states.
It was revealed in the course of an inquiry that a Yekaterinburg resident had come to the insurance company’s office to get the obligatory third-party liability car insurance.
The company only agreed to sell the customer the insurance policy if he also bought life insurance for a one-year period (March 22, 2015 to March 21, 2016). As a result, the customer had to sign a contract for the latter and pay an extra 2,000 RUR.
Justice of the Peace declared the latter contract void, so Rosgosstrakh was made to pay the 2,000 RUR back as well as to cover moral damage (2,000 RUR) and postal expenses (247.71 RUR) and to pay a 2,000-ruble fine for failing to respond to the customer’s actual needs (6,247 RUR all in all).
In fact, Kamensk Uralsky division of Rospotrebnadzor had laid its claim against Rosgosstrakh earlier, demanding that the insurance company stop infringing extra services upon its customers. Sinara District Court of Kamensk Uralsky sustained the plaintiff’s claim at the time.
It was revealed in the course of an inquiry that a Yekaterinburg resident had come to the insurance company’s office to get the obligatory third-party liability car insurance.
The company only agreed to sell the customer the insurance policy if he also bought life insurance for a one-year period (March 22, 2015 to March 21, 2016). As a result, the customer had to sign a contract for the latter and pay an extra 2,000 RUR.
Justice of the Peace declared the latter contract void, so Rosgosstrakh was made to pay the 2,000 RUR back as well as to cover moral damage (2,000 RUR) and postal expenses (247.71 RUR) and to pay a 2,000-ruble fine for failing to respond to the customer’s actual needs (6,247 RUR all in all).
In fact, Kamensk Uralsky division of Rospotrebnadzor had laid its claim against Rosgosstrakh earlier, demanding that the insurance company stop infringing extra services upon its customers. Sinara District Court of Kamensk Uralsky sustained the plaintiff’s claim at the time.
Embed to Blog | Subscribe to Newsletter |
Other materials on the topic::
- Rossgosstrakh: 4.65bn RUR in Net Loss in 2015
- Credit Europe Bank makes car buyer purchase six insurance policies into the bargain
- OTP Bank turns out to violate consumer rights legislation
- TRUST National Bank pays over 200,000 RUR for imposing services upon customer
- Federal Antimonopoly Service to go on with Rosgosstrakh-Ural’s case