ROSNO-MS acquires Tagil Medservice Ltd.

‘If ROSNO fails to comply with our requirements, this insurer is going to be sanctioned,’ Olga Tsarkova, Assistant to the Head of the Federal Insurance Surveillance Agency, said to UrBC representative. The disagreement between ROSNO and UralTransBank has still not been settled; both companies claim that the other party does not meet its agreement liabilities. This quarrel has already become known to the public as the Association of Regional Russian Banks and the Federal Insurance Surveillance Agency got involved in the conflict; the latter considered the claim of UralTransBank and gave some

ROSNO, the insurance company, started making insurance payments to travelers who found themselves dumped by Detour on their vacations. The insurer is currently compensating those who’ve applied for an insurance indemnity and produced all the documents the federal legislation states are needed to prove a breach in contractual obligations and to estimate the damage done to the victim. ROSNO makes up for both the damage caused by the tour operator’s failing to provide a traveler with the necessary papers (tickets, travel pass, hotel reservations, etc), thus making it impossible for a customer to

ROSNO, the insurance company, has received over 200 applications from Detour’s unfortunate customers by July 28, 2008. The upper limit for the insurance indemnity provided by Detour and ROSNO’s agreement was set at 10 million RUR, while the claims laid by the bankrupt tour operator’s victims have so far amounted to over 20 million RUR already; besides, the unhappy travelers’ applications keep coming over an ad hoc hotline. The insurer has already been able to come up with some statistics: the company reports travelers’ money claims vary between 20,000 RUR and 600,000 RUR. The spread can be

The 17th Arbitration & Appeals Court supported the ruling pronounced by Russia’s Federal Antimonopoly Service in Perm Territory; the FAS’s division declared that the Russian Sberbank and ROSNO Insurance Company engaged in collusion. The court also ruled that the antimonopoly agency’s order to the bank and to the insurer to transfer the illegitimate profits (293m RUR and 40m RUR, respectively) to the federal budget was lawful. It is reported that in November 2011 Perm Territory division of Russia’s Federal Antimonopoly Service declared Sberbank and ROSNO had violated the law in that the

The dispute between two administrative bodies, namely, ROSNO, the insurance company, and UralTransBank, keeps unwinding. The bank accused the insurer of failing to meet its liabilities in terms of compensation payments related to credit insurance. The bank also claimed that ROSNO never provided any well-grounded explanations as to why they kept refusing to pay the bank. ROSNO, on its part, accuses UralTransBank of failing to produce the papers needed to get the compensation despite the existing agreements. Moreover, the insurer says that the bank was trying to receive several payments for one